Coprophile Criticism

Coprophile Criticism

Literary criticism is usually thought of as being either an analysis of the author’s mind based on the text, or of the text independent of the author’s intention. Consequently, Jungian literary criticism, which is based on an analysis of the educational intent of the author is a dominant form. According to the developmental psychologist, Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), literary products are an expression of what he called ‘the Self’, which was conscious and/or unconscious to a lesser or greater degree. The work could be analyzed critically to determine to what extent the author intended to write what was written, and also what the author was unconsciously revealing about his/her nature and/or human nature through the text.

 Criticism that didn’t consider the author or text as anything other than a convenience for their opinions about civilization, culture, and art, were identifiably coprophile, that is, the work of the author was an excretion, which was what the author was. This approach to literature derived from Jung’s predecessor, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), who described all civilization, culture and art as ‘nothing but’  the excretions of the sexually repressed human mind. For Freud the unconscious was the repressed ‘id’, which essentially was a convenience from whence humans excreted, whereas Jung’s perception of the unconscious ‘Self’ was of a consciousness in the process of becoming. Jung posited a collective human unconscious containing what he called ‘archetypes’ existing as a facultas praeformandi, that is, a pre-existent capacity to adapt. Jungian psychology identified many archetypes, for example, the hero, which was associated with the ego, and the anima corresponding to various aspects of the feminine and/or female, that is, mother, daughter, sister, wife, etc. Jungian literary analysis used archetypal knowledge to interpret text and mind of the author in order to understand what was being expressed and/or activated within the mind of the reader, so providing an analytical framework for determining a work’s positive or negative effect.

 Although humans constitute a pool of knowledge, which can be accessed, for the coprophile humans should be a cess pool. Analysts are associated with the concept, ‘anal’, because they’re prepared to examine the products of human consciousness after Freud’s defining it as ‘nothing but’ excretive. Coprophiles, however, believe Freud, that is, all human activity is excrescence, that is, ‘shit’. In literary terms, this results in a determinist approach towards criticism that is coprophile. The author and the work are interpreted by as being of the degree of worthlessness that the mind of the coprophile can ascribe to it. Consequently, much of supposed literary analysis is thinly disguised coprophilia, because the critic is in love with their own shit and so reject the text as not being the convenience they want in order to express their self-love. The result is that society’s development can be measured by reference to the extent to which coprophile analysis prevails, that is, demonstrable ignorance of the text on the part of the critic.

A sociologically pertinent instance is ISIS, the Independent State of Iraq and Syria, whose flag, ‘There is no God but God’, features a bone white moon. Isis was the sun goddess of ancient Egypt, which religion was superseded by Islam.  Although the Prophet Mohamed’s Koran (610-30 C.E.), which was supposedly gifted by the angels of God, forms the basis of Islamic belief, Islam is perceived by Judeo-Christianity as illegitimate, because Mohamed was of the line of Ishmael, who was the second son of Abraham, the father of Isaac, who founded Judeo-Christianity. When Sara, his wife, became barren, she gave Abraham her maid, Hajer, who bore Ishmael. Judeo-Christianity perceives Islam as illegitimate because Hajer was unwed. Consequently, a preoccupation with Islamicists is legitimacy. The Moslem peoples’ permitting  themselves four wives is a retroactive attempt to legitimize Ishmael’s birth  from a woman unwed by making polygamy de rigeur. Moreover, according to Jung, there are four functions of consciousness, that is, ‘Sensation, Thinking, Feeling and Intuition’. Coming to consciousness is a process of developing the functions, so the four wife marriage of the Moslem peoples is a developmental archetype. The earlier model is demonstrated in the ancient Egyptian myth of the sun god, Ra, who incarnates upon the Earth as Osiris, who is dismembered by his evil brother, the god Set, before Isis, the sun goddess, recovers the pieces of Osiris’ dismembered body and restores him.  The four-part myth describes the process of what Jung called ‘individuation’, that is, individual development or growth through experience of the world.

 The Independent State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is symptomatic of coprophile analysis, that is, associated with the bone white sterility of the moon, whereas Isis is the name of the resurrecting Egyptian sun goddess, ISIS is deterministically nihilist, because it’s rejective of life. Christianity, however, perceives itself as the expert on Resurrection, because Jesus ‘Christ’, the Jewish Messiah, was taken to the hill of Calvary outside the city of Jerusalem by agents of the Roman Empire then occupying Jewish Palestine for preaching, ‘Love your neighbor as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) Nailed to a cross of wood, and left there to die as a ‘dissident’, Jesus experienced Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, because he was born of his mother, the Virgin Mary, so represented the future Resurrection and Ascension of ‘woman’s seed` to colonize the planets amongst the stars. The futanarian human species of ‘woman’s seed’ capable of sexually reproducing humans between women was what men had repressed. Although Sigmund Freud identified ‘penis envy’1 as the root of a young girl’s problematic psychology, he didn’t understand that it was her race that had been made almost extinct by men, so she was angry at not having a penis of her own, which futanarian women have. In short, Christianity is an instance of coprophile criticism, because Jesus’ teaching has been repressed in favor of a simplistic convenience.

 Although ISIS, and ISIL, which was a title adopted by, amongst others, Moslem Russian Chechnyans in the Caucasus, who wanted an Independent State in the Levant (ISIL) where Jewish Palestine is situated, represent a concern with borders, it’s the borders of death cards for ‘woman’s seed` that’s the real issue. Russian President Vladimir Putin warred on Chechnya to secure the city of Derbent at what’s known as ‘the gateway to the East’, that is, the former Empire of Persia, which became Iran and Iraq, where ISIS’ leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was declared the ruler of a new Islamic Caliphate in June 2014. Moreover, it was Russia’s decision to withdraw its influence over Yugoslavia that resulted in the Moslem-Christian wars for independent states in the region. During the Bosnian war (1992-5), for example, 70, 000 Moslem women were placed in ‘rape camps’ by Serbian Christian militia to ensure that a generation of newborn Moslems would be male brained, that is, it was an act of extinction of ‘woman’s seed`, because the human futanarian species of women was being targeted by those concerned with securing their borders against her. In simple terms, humanity’s borders were those of her death card, and her borders were being patrolled by her death camp guards. Because Moslems were permitted of four wives, their families were archetypal structures for the sexual reproduction of women between women, which was Christianity didn’t want Islam. However, Islam’s mistake was to equate men with humanity, that is, ISIS espoused the sterility of the bone white moon, and with ‘There is no God but God’ as its emblem, whereas the sun goddess Isis was the more ancient Egyptian symbol for life through women which was legitimate. Or, in other words, the borders of women’s death guards are an instance of the coprophile critic having achieved ascendancy over the life of the author, Mohamed, and the text, the Koran.

 Although the terrorist attack by Saudi Arabia’s Osama Ben Laden’s Al Qaeda group operating out of Afghanistan under the auspices of the notoriously misogynist Taliban regime on September 11, 2001, has been interpreted as an instance of ‘rough trade’,2 that is, a brutal act of homosexuality directed against the World Trade Center in New York city after the terrorists hijacked civil airliners to crash into the Twin Tower of the WTC, 9/11’s events signaled the beginning of the Levant’s wars. Because futanarian women are known for having huge penis, they’re elephants to men, that is, the human species of ‘woman’s seed’ is the target of their hunting. In short, 9/11’s events were aimed at provoking the United States of America’s attack on the only family unit to provide the possibility of human sexual reproduction between women, that is, Moslem Islam’s. Because Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein, whose army had previously invaded Kuwait in what was known as ‘the rape of Kuwait` in 1990, before it was ejected by the US’ army in 1991, publicly espoused Al Qaeda, the US ‘ army invaded and deposed him in March 2003, but the result was Iraqi Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi’s ISIS, that is, an instance of coprophile criticism, whereby the sterile bone white moon became associated with the Egyptian sun goddess, Isis, who wasn’t a symbol of her human species’ death. In other words, because the male brain is dyslexic it misinterpreted the text. Repressed into unconsciousness, futanarian ‘woman’s seed` represent the only possibility for the sexual reproduction of a psychologically balanced and conscious human race. However, manufactured as a single male brained creature wearing each other’s clothes in ‘TV’ transvestism for an alien to watch in ‘TV wars’ against itself, the human species can’t analyze its authors and texts well enough to avoid being exterminated in coprophilia.

1 Sigmund Freud, On Sexuality (PFL 7), p. 195-6.

2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_(gay_slang)#Rough_trade .